Peluang Fraud Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) atas Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintahan

Authors

  • Meliana Puspitasari Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Randhi Pradana Lukman Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Keywords:

PPK, PBJ, Fraud, Fraud Opportunity, Corruptions

Abstract

This study aims to propose the factors forming the opportunity for fraud to Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) on the Government Procurement-Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (PBJ) . The approach used in this research is Donald Cressey's the Triangle Fraud. This research uses a qualitative research methodology with a case study approach that focuses on the comparison of authority and the scheme of fraud used in cases of criminal acts of corruption. The research was conducted by collecting secondary data in the form of court decision documents in corruption cases. The results of this study indicate that cases of corruption in the procurement of goods and services are generally carried out collectively between the PPK, the provider, and the Pokja team. Effectiveness of Internal Control, Authority of PPK, and Access to Assets and Information effectively create opportunities for fraud. The powers that be held are also effectively used to carry out fraudulent schemes.

References

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2011), Fraud Examiners Manual

(International Edition) ISBN 1-889277-11-8

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2014), Fraud Examiners Manual : International Edition.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (2018), Report To The Nations 2018

Global Study On Occupational Fraud And Abuse, ASIA-PACIFIC EDITION. Diakses dari https://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/rttn/2018/RTTN- Asia-Pacific-Edition.pdf

ACFE Indonesia Chapter (2019), Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019, Jakarta

Albrecht, Chado Albrecht, Conanc Albrecht, Markf Zimbelman (2012) Fraud

Examination Fourth Edition, South-Western, Cengage Learning

C. Bishop, D. Hermanson, dan R. Riley Collusion: Leader, Fraud and Organizational Attributes, ed., C. Bailey (FL: Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 2017).

Cressey, Donald. (1953) Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe, IL: Free Press,.

COSO (2012), Internal Control – Integrated Framework .

French, Jr., and B. Raven, (1959) “The Basis of Social Power,” in D. Cartwright,

ed., Studies in Social Power (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press,).

KPK

https://aclc.kpk.go.id/materi/bahaya-dan-dampak- korupsi/infografis/kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-di-indonesia

https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/data-icw-kerugian-negara-rp392-triliun- uang-pengganti-dari-koruptor-hanya-rp23-t.html

https://www.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/penindakan/tpk-berdasarkan-jenis-perkara

Indonesia Corruption Watch (2019), Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Tahun

, diakses dari https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/dokumen/Tren%20Pengadaan%202019.p df

Vona, Leonard W (2008), Fraud Risk Assessment : Building a Fraud Audit

Program, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

Martin T. Biegelman dan Joel T. Bartow (2012) Executive Roadmap to Fraud Prevention and Internal Control: Creating a Culture of Compliance, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.

Padgett, Simon (2014), Profiling The Fraudster: Removing the Mask to Prevent and

Detect Fraud. Wiley

S. Ramamoorti and W. Olsen, (2007) “Fraud: The Human Faktor,” Financial

Executive (July–August 2007): 53–55.

Sridhar Ramamoorti; Kelly R. Pope; David E. Morrison III; Joseph W. Koletar (2013), A.B.C.'s of Behavioral Forensics: Applying Psychology to Financial Fraud Prevention and Detection. Wiley

Giles, Stave (2012), Managing Fraud Risk: A Practical Guide For Directors and

Managers . Wiley

Pedneault, Stephen (2009), Techniques and Strategies for Understanding Fraud

Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wells, Joseph T (2013), Principles Of Fraud Examination, Fourth Edition, Willey Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 Tentang Sistem Pengendalian

Internal Pemerintah.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 57/Pid-sus-TPK/2017/PN.Bdg, diakses pada https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/07aa35137e8e58caf6f23

a4803.html

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 90/Pid.Sus-TPK/2014/PN.Smg, diakses pada https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/73d4ec583834fff1c483e

efda20.html

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2015/PN.Smg, diakses pada https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/93d5ea2761e799c6e33c

b359e5e5bf.html

Downloads

Published

2021-03-20

How to Cite

Meliana Puspitasari, & Randhi Pradana Lukman. (2021). Peluang Fraud Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen (PPK) atas Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintahan. Conference on Economic and Business Innovation (CEBI), 1(1), 1036–1051. Retrieved from https://jurnal.widyagama.ac.id/index.php/cebi/article/view/170

Issue

Section

Articles Text