Comparison of Indonesian Criminal Law With The UK
Keywords:
Comparative, Criminal, Indonesia, UKAbstract
Comparative criminal law is the activity of comparing legal systems with each other, both between nations, states,
and even religions, to find and signal differences and similarities with the members of the explanation and
researching how the law functions and how its juridical solution is in practice and any non-legal factors that affect
it. So a scientific comparison of law requires a comparison of legal history. The benefits of Comparative Law are:
Useful for national, regional, and international unification and codification. For legal harmonization, between
international conventions and national regulations. Legal reform, can deepen knowledge of national law and be
able to objectively see the advantages and disadvantages of national law. To determine the general principles of
law (especially for judges of international courts). It is important to determine the general principles of law which
are an important source of the international public. The object of legal comparison is the legal system (system or
field) in a country that has more than one legal system (e.g. civil law can be compared with written civil law) or
the fields of law in a country that has one legal system (e.g. causality requirements in criminal and civil law,
representative construction in civil and criminal law or foreign legal systems (fields) compared with joint legal
systems (fields) (e.g. law of contract compared to the law of the agreement)
References
Adib, Mochamad, Zain Hakim at the Court, Rengat State, Class II, Jl Raya Belilas, Pamatang
Reba, and Rengat Indragiri Hulu. “THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY VILLAGE IN
FORMULATING AND IMPLEMENTING CRIMINAL PROVISIONS DERIVED
FROM THE LIVING LAW OF THE COMMUNITY AS STIPULATED IN THE NEW
CRIMINAL LAW CODE” 12 (2023).
Allan, T. R.S. “Questions of Legality and Legitimacy: Form and Substance in British
Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 9, no. 1 (2011): 155–62.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor017.
Andi Hamzah. “Criminal Code & Criminal Code of Indonesia Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia, Legal Systems in the World,” n.d.
Arimuladi, Setia Untung. “Access to Justice Based on Expert Testimony in Tax Crimes: An
Integrated Criminal Justice System Perspective in Indonesia.” Pandecta Research Law
Journal 17, no. 1 (2022): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v17i1.32622.
Bolifaar, Andhy Hermawan, Henry Dianto, and Pardamean Sinaga. “Managing Evidence of
Tax Crime in Indonesia : An Artificial Intelligence Approach in Integrated Criminal
Justice System Of” 27, no. 1 (2020): 143–59.
Bolifaar, Andhy Hermawan, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, Pujiyono, and Faisal Arif.
“Authority of Indonesian Attorney in Handling the Corruption Crimes: A Perspective of
Integrated Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues 22,
no. 5 (2019): 1–8.
Cohn, Margit. “Legal Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and
Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United Kingdom.” American
Journal of Comparative Law 58, no. 3 (2010): 583–630.
https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2009.0048.
Coleman, Jules L., and Richard A. Epstein. “A Theory of Strict Liability.” The Philosophical
Review 92, no. 4 (1983): 613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184887.
Husain, Gusrinaldy Sani Catur Putra, Azwad Rachmat Hambali, and Nur Fadhillah
Mappaseleng. “Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law ( IJoCL ).” Indonesia Journal of
Criminal Law 2, no. 2 (2020): 93–104.
Justification, B Original. “THE NORMATIVE Y OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGALITY Y,”
, 372–414.
Kiss, Alexandre, and Dinah Shelton. “Strict Liability in International Environmental Law.”
Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge
Thomas A. Mensah, 2007, 1131–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161566.i1188.183.
Lubomira Kubica, Maria. “Origins of Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities in
the United States, Rylands v. Fletcher and a General Clause of Strict Liability in the
UK.” International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and
Industrial Engineering 10, no. 3 (2016): 870–81.
Marwan, M, and Jimmy P. Kamus Hukum (Dictionary of Law Complete Edition). Surabaya:
Reality Publisher, 2009.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Nur, Muhammad. “An Overview of Drug-Related Criminal Acts as Extraordinary Crimes in
Indonesia Abstract :” 2024, 38–49.
PAN, Lung-Jui. “Https://Theses.Gla.Ac.Uk/ Theses Digitisation:” 1999, 284.
Prof. Nawawi Arief, Barda, S.H. Comparative Criminal Law. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo
Persada, 2010.
Rofiq, Ahmad. “Asas Strict Liability Sebagai Penyeimbang Asas Kesalahan Dalam Hukum
Pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability as a Counterbalance to the Principle of Error in
Indonesian Criminal Law).” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. December (2022): 319–
http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v.
Rofiq, Ahmad, Hari Sutra Disemadi, and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Criminal Objectives
Integrality in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Al-Risalah 19, no. 2 (2019): 179.
https://doi.org/10.30631/al-risalah.v19i2.458.
Syah, Azizan. “Analisis Yuridis Keputusan Menteri Hukum Dan HAM Tahun 2020 Tentang
Pengeluaran Dan Pembebasan Narapidana Dan Anak Melalui Asimilasi Dan Integrasi
Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Dan Penanggulangan Penyebaran Covid-19,” 2020.
Tolkah, Tolkah. “Customary Law Existency in The Modernization of Criminal Law in
Indonesia.” Varia Justicia 17, no. 1 (2021): 72–89.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reynaldi Julyan Nur Rachman, Lukman Hakim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.