Pengaruh Perspektif Fraud Triangle Dalam Upaya Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2017-2019)
Keywords:
Fraud Triangle, Financial Statement Fraud, Earnings Management, Modified Jones Model, Binary LogisticAbstract
According to the RTTN ACFE Global on 2016 and 2018, financial statement fraud is a type of fraud with the least frequency of occurrence but causes a large median loss. This research was conducted to determine the effect of the fraud triangle perspective which proxied by financial stability, external pressure, financial targets, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, and total accrual towards the financial statement fraud which proxied by earnings management. Samples in this research are 25 banking company listed in IDX on 2017-2019 which selected by criterias. Hypothesis testing was conducted using binary logistic regression with SPSS 23 Software.
The results showed that simultaneously the fraud triangle perspective has an influence of financial statement fraud. Partially, only pressure factor that is financial targets which proxied by return on asset (ROA) shown influential. While other pressure factor that is financial stability which proxied by change in total assets (ACHANGE), external pressure which proxied by debt to asset (DAR), opportunity factor that is nature of industry which proxied by change in receivable (RECEIVE), ineffective monitoring which proxied by ratio of independent board (BDOUT) and rationalization factor which proxied by total accruals (TACC) has no effect of financial statement fraud.
References
ACFE. (2018). Report to The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud
Study.
ACFE. (2016). Report to The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Global Fraud
Study.
Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Y. Asmaranti. (2016). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan
Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi. 23(1): 72-89.
Ardiyani, D., Utaminingsih, N.S. (2016). Analisis Determinan Financial Statement
Melalui Pendekatan Fraud Triangle. Accounting Analysis Journal. 4(1): 1-10.
Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. (2009). PSAK No.1 (revisi 2009): Penyajian
Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: IAI.
Dewan Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. (2000). PSA No. 70: Perimbangan Atas
Kecurangan Dalam Audit Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: IAPI.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.).
Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Harlan, J. (2018). Analisis Regresi Logistik. Depok: Penerbit Gunadarma.
MerthaJaya, I.M.L., Poerwono, A.A.A. (2019). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Indonesia. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi. 12(2): 157-168.
Muid, D. (2019). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Manajemen Laba Pada Perusahaan
Perbankan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi & Bisnis. 6(2): 121-
Nugraheni, N.K., Triatmoko, H. (2017). Analisi Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Terjadinya Financial Statement Fraud: Perspektif Diamond Fraud Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing. 14(2): 118-143.
Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 13/1/PBI/2011 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan
Bank Umum (“PBI Nomor 13/1/PBI/2011”)
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Penerapan Strategi Anti
Fraud Bagi Bank Umum (“POJK Nomor 39/POJK.03/2019”)
Pratiwi, R.P., & Nurbaiti, A. (2018). Analisis Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Metode F-SCORE MODEL : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2012-2016. E-Proceeding of Management. 5(3): 3299-3306.
Prayoga, M.A., Sudarmaji E. (2019). Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Transportasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. 21(1): 89-102.
Rini, V.Y., Achmad, T. (2012). Analisis Prediksi Potensi Resiko Fraudulent Financial
Statement Melalui Fraud Score Model. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 1(1): 1-
Sihombing, K.S., & Rahardjo, S.N. (2014). Analisis Fraud Diamond Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2010-2012. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 3(2): 1-12.
Skousen, C.J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and Predecting Financial
Statement Fraud : The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No.99.
Sudarmo, T. Sawardi., & A. Yulianto. (2008). Fraud Auditing :Edisi Kelima.
Pusdiklatwas BPKP.
Sugiyanto. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: CV.
Alfabeta
Suryandari, N.N., & Endiana, I.D. (2019). Fraudulent Financial Statement. Badung: CV.
Noah Aletheia.
Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif (Edisi 2).
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Utama, I.G., I.W. Ramantha, & I.D. Badera. (2018). Analisis Faktor-faktor Dalam Perspektif Fraud Triangle Sebagai Prediktor Fraudulent Financial Reporting. E Journal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana. 7(1): 251-278.
Wati, C., & Puspitasari, W. (2017). Pengaruh Fraud Diamond, Corporate Governance, Dan Kompleksitas Bank Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Perbankan. 4(2):157-168
Wicaksana, E.A., & Suryandari, D. (2019). Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Keuangan. 4(2): 44-59.
Widarti (2015). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle Terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Sriwijaya. 13(2): 229-244.
Yesiariani, M., & Rahayu. I. (2017). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud : Pengujian dengan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia. 21(1): 49-60.