Branding, Legitimacy, and Trust in Early Growth: Cases Study Grassroots Coffee Entrepreneurship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/bmb.v7i1.936Keywords:
Grassroots Coffee Entrepreneurship, Brand Identity, Legitimacy, Digital Visibility, Entrepreneurial BricolageAbstract
This study explores how branding operates as a mechanism of legitimacy and trust formation within grassroots coffee entrepreneurship during the early growth stage. Situated within informal urban settings characterized by institutional voids and resource constraints, micro coffee ventures rely not only on financial capital but also on social embeddedness, relational legitimacy, and adaptive entrepreneurial practices. Using a qualitative interpretive approach with the Gioia methodology, this research examines four micro coffee enterprises operating for 23–25 months and categorized within the early growth phase in Bandar Lampung. Data were collected from eight informants, consisting of business owners and employees, to capture both strategic and operational perspectives.
The findings reveal three interrelated aggregate dimensions. First, brand identity and value proposition are constructed through personal narratives, community orientation, and product authenticity rather than formalized strategic planning. Brand identity functions as a symbolic representation of meaning, while the value proposition provides rational validation through affordability, product consistency, and local differentiation. Second, digital visibility plays a significant role in trust formation. Social media engagement enhances brand salience and mental availability, while user-generated content and repost activities generate social proof that substitutes for formal reputational mechanisms. Third, entrepreneurial adaptation under resource constraints is manifested through bricolage practices and incremental capability development.
The study contributes theoretically by integrating branding, legitimacy, and entrepreneurial bricolage within the micro-enterprise context. It demonstrates that branding functions as a socially embedded process enabling legitimacy construction and trust accumulation. Practically, sustainable growth depends on relational credibility, digital consistency, and adaptive capacity.
References
Ailawadi, K. L., & Keller, K. L. (2004). Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.10.008
Appio, F. P., Cacciatore, E., Cesaroni, F., Crupi, A., & Marozzo, V. (2024). Open innovation at the digital frontier: Unraveling the paradoxes and roadmaps for SMEs’ successful digital transformation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2023-0343
Bacq, S., Ofstein, L. F., Kickul, J. R., & Gundry, L. K. (2015). Bricolage in Social Entrepreneurship: How Creative Resource Mobilization Fosters Greater Social Impact. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2015.0198
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Bansal, P. (Tima), Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New Ways of Seeing through Qualitative Research. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1189–1195. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4004
Ciambotti, G., Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2023). Enabling bricolage in resource-constrained contexts: The role of sense of community and passion in African social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(1), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2022-0049
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). BUILDING THEORY ABOUT THEORY BUILDING: WHAT CONSTITUTES A THEORETICAL CONTRIBUTION? Academy of Management Review.
Desa, G. (2012). Resource Mobilization in International Social Entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a Mechanism of Institutional Transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00430.x
Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C.-C. (2010). Towards a Foundation of Bricolage in Organization and Management Theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4004
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, Causation, and Bricolage: A Behavioral Comparison of Emerging Theories in Entrepreneurship Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x
Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., & Rialp, J. (2019). How does sensory brand experience influence brand equity? Considering the roles of customer satisfaction, customer affective commitment, and employee empathy. Journal of Business Research, 96, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.043
Iswari, H. R., Anam, C., Rahma, A., Setiawan, B., Sirodjudin, M., Dayat, M., ... & Rahawarin, F. R. (2023). MANAJEMEN UMKM DAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN Studi Kasus Dan Hasil Pemikiran. SCOPINDO MEDIA PUSTAKA.
Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., & Tanvig, H. W. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2013-0205
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15 [edition]). Pearson.
Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management. In D. D. Bergh & D. J. Ketchen (Eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Vol. 6, pp. 201–235). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2011)0000006007
Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021a). Social media marketing strategy: Definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3
Li, F., Larimo, J., & Leonidou, L. C. (2021b). Social media marketing strategy: Definition, conceptualization, taxonomy, validation, and future agenda. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00733-3
Li, X., Lim, M.-F., Ramlee, A. N. A., & Chekima, B. (2024). Brand Authenticity: A 21-Year Bibliometric Review and Future Outlook. Sage Open, 14(3), 21582440241268847. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268847
Mateus, S., & Sarkar, S. (2024). Bricolage – a systematic review, conceptualization, and research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 36(7–8), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2303426
Merz, M. A., Zarantonello, L., & Grappi, S. (2018). How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale. Journal of Business Research, 82, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.018
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2014). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.001
Pratt, M. G., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2020). Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
Reay, T., Zafar, A., Monteiro, P., & Glaser, V. (2019). Presenting Findings from Qualitative Research: One Size Does Not Fit All! In T. B. Zilber, J. M. Amis, & J. Mair (Eds.), The Production of Managerial Knowledge and Organizational Theory: New Approaches to Writing, Producing and Consuming Theory (pp. 201–216). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20190000059011
Salvi, E., Belz, F.-M., & Bacq, S. (2023). Informal Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(2), 265–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221115365
Spence, M., & Hamzaoui Essoussi, L. (2010). SME brand building and management: An exploratory study. European Journal of Marketing, 44(7/8), 1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011047517
Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
Sutter, C., Bruton, G. D., & Chen, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(1), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.003
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Webb, J. W., Khoury, T. A., & Hitt, M. A. (2020). The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutional Voids on Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719830310
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing Entrepreneurship—Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday Entrepreneurship—A Call for Entrepreneurship Research to Embrace Entrepreneurial Diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12258
