Transdisciplinary Risk Management Accounting 4.0: Finance Egalitarian Digital Evidance From Indonesia

Authors

  • Whedy Prasetyo University Of Jember
  • Mohammad Fiqkri University Of Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/cebi.v3i1.342

Keywords:

Transdisciplinary, Risk Management Accounting 4.0, Egalitarian Digital

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to development of a transdisciplinary risk management accounting 4.0 through comprehensive skills, technology updates, and knowledge upgrades. This achievement requires reflection and supervision in awareness, professional development, education and reaching out through creative, independent and responsible exploration. In so doing, it draws upon insights from other papers in risk management accounting on the theme of high order cognitive skills finance for business. The paper draws heutagogical philosophy by providing choices and opportunities to design the business process in descriptive qualitative through in-depth interviews with educational observers. The paper explain that the risk finance design for business accounting management fosters the convergence of knowledge and technology. This convergence makes the development of business adaptive. The paper produce a risk management that promotes a dynamic and flexible egalitarian digital to explore scholar creatively, independently and responsibly.

References

Bourmistrov, A. 2020. From educating agents to change agents: experience of using foresight in accounting education, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 16(4), pp. 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-08-2020-0122.

Cheung, R. W. Y. 2019. Hiring Decisions of Entry-Level Graduates: Does Professional Accreditation Matter? Perception Gaps between Accountants and Students. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 4(6), pp. 293–299. https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2019-46004.

Demski, J. S. 2007. Is accounting an academic discipline?’. in Accounting Horizons, pp. 153–157. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.153.

Djamhuri, A. 2011. Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Berbagai Paradigma Dalam Kajian Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 2(1), pp. 147–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2011.04.7115

Duff, A. 2014. Learning styles and approaches in accounting education. in The Routledge Companion to Accounting Education, pp. 163–188. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315889801.

Duff, A., and McKinstry, S. 2007. Students’ Approaches to Learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), pp. 183–214. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183.

Fogarty, T. J. 2020. Accounting education in the post-COVID world: looking into the Mirror of Erised. Accounting Education, 29(6), pp. 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1852945.

Fordham, D. R. and Hayes, D. C. 2009. Worth repeating: Paper color may have an effect on student performance. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(2), pp. 187–194. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2009.24.2.187.

Gnangnon, S. K. and Brun, J. F. 2019. Internet and the structure of public revenue: resource revenue versus non‑resource revenue. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1), pp. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008‑018‑0132‑0.

Goldwater, P. M. and Fogarty, T. J. 2007. Protecting the Solution: A “High-Tech.” Method to Guarantee Individual Effort in Accounting Classes. Accounting Education, 16(2), pp. 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639280701234344.

Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E. and Wilson, C. 2021. Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. J. Comput. Educ., 8(1), pp. 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2.

Helm, D. 2020. The Environmental Impacts of the Coronavirus. Environmental and Resource Economics, 76, pp. 21–38.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00426-z.

Bogt, H. T., and Helden, J. V. 2012. The practical relevance of management accounting research and the role of qualitative methods therein The debate continues. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 9(3), pp. 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/11766091211257470.

Ismail, Z., Ahmad, A. S. and Ahmi, A. 2020. Perceived Employability Skills of Accounting Graduates: The Insights from Employers. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), pp. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.104.

Käpplinger, B. and Lichte, N. 2020. The lockdown of physical co‑operation touches the heart of adult education: A Delphi study on immediate and expected effects of COVID‑19. International Review of Education, 66, pp. 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09871-w.

Lashine, S. H. and Mohamed, E. K. A. 2013. Accounting knowledge and skills and the challenges of a global business environment. Managerial Finance, 29(7), pp. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350310768319.

Livdan, D. and Nezlobin, A. 2017. Accounting rules, equity valuation, and growth options. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(3), pp. 1122–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9402-6.

Ma, C., Song, Z., Yan, X. and Zhao, G. 2018. Accounting for tastes: do low-income populations have a higher preference for spicy foods?. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 5(17), pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-018-0089-2.

Marriott, P. and McGuigan, N. 2018. Visual Metaphor and Visual Tools in Accounting Education. Accounting Education, 27(6), pp. 549–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1541520.

Al Masum, M. and Parker, L. D. 2020. Local implementation of global accounting reform: evidence from a developing country. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(3), pp. 373–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-10-2018-0073.

Mohammed, A. A., Hafeez-Baig, A. and Gururajan, R. 2018. Exploring Processes that are Used for Managing Knowledge in the Higher Education Environment: A Case Study in a Queensland Regional University. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2018-32004.

Parker, L. D. 2008. Strategic management and accounting processes: Acknowledging gender. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(4), pp. 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872941.

Parker, L. D. 2020. The COVID-19 office in transition: cost, efficiency and the social responsibility business case. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(8), pp. 1943–1967. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4609.

Pincus, K. V., Stout, D. E., Sorensen, J. E., Stocks, K. D. and Lawson, R. A. 2017. Forces for change in higher education and implications for the accounting academy. Journal of Accounting Education, 40, pp. 1–18. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.06.001.

Prasetyo, W. 2019. Akuntansi 4.0: Belajar Transdisipliner Momong, Among, Ngemong. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 3(3), pp. 217–228. https://doi.org/10.18382/jraam.v3i3.217.

Reiss, M. J. 2020. Science Education in the Light of COVID-19 The Contribution of History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science. Science & Education, 29, pp. 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00143-5.

Sangster, A., Stoner, G. and Flood, B. 2020. Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), pp. 431–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487.

Schlenz, M. A., Schmidt, A., Wöstmann, B., Krämer, N. and Nelly, S. W. 2020. Students’ and lecturers’ perspective on the implementation of online learning in dental education due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20, pp. 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02266-3.

Schöndube-Pirchegger, B. and Schöndube, J. R. 2017. Relevance versus reliability of accounting information with unlimited and limited commitment. Business Research, 10(2), pp. 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0050-2.

Springer, C. W. and Borthick, A. F. 2004. Business simulation to stage critical thinking in introductory accounting: Rationale, design and implementation. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(3), pp. 277–303. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2004.19.3.277.

Suwardjono. 2016. Teori Akuntansi Perekayasaan Pelaporan Keuangan. Edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.

Utama, D. 2016. Pencarian Bentuk Penelitian Untuk Mengaktualisasikan Prinsip Counter Accounting. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(3), pp. 462–484.https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.12.7033.

Villiers, C. D., Rinaldi, L. and Unerman, J. 2014. Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp. 1042–1067. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736.

Villiers, C. D., Hsiao, P. C. K. and Maroun, W. 2017. Developing a Conceptual Model of influences around Integrated Reporting, New Insights, and Directions for Future Research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), pp. 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2017-0183.

Watkins, A. L. 2007. An Accountability View of Accounting. The CPA Journal, 77(2), pp.6-9.

Zhao, Y. 2020. COVID‑19 as a catalyst for educational change. Prospects, 49, pp. 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09477-y.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Whedy Prasetyo, & Mohammad Fiqkri. (2023). Transdisciplinary Risk Management Accounting 4.0: Finance Egalitarian Digital Evidance From Indonesia. Conference on Economic and Business Innovation (CEBI), 3(1), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.31328/cebi.v3i1.342

Issue

Section

Articles Text