The Urgency Of Formulating A Law On Asset Forfeiture Using The Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Method As A Measure To Prevent Corruption Crimes

Authors

  • Nur Aini Universitas Widya Gama Malang
  • Ibnu Subarkah Universitas Widya Gama Malang
  • Zulkarnain Universitas Widya Gama Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wglr.v2i2.917

Abstract

The “Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (hereinafter referred to as NCB Asset Forfeiture)” method is an
approach in asset confiscation law that allows authorities to confiscate assets related to illegal activities without
requiring a court decision regarding the criminal wrongdoing of the asset owner. In the formation of legislation
regarding asset confiscation in Indonesia, it is necessary to include this method as a direction for more flexible
and effective law enforcement against criminal acts of corruption. Applying the NCB Asset Forfeiture method
ideally in the Indonesian legal system, it is necessary to consider several main elements in the legal and
regulatory system that will be formed, these elements are 1) a clear and comprehensive legal framework; 2)
transparent procedures and standards; 3) rights and protection of related parties; 4) authority and capacity of law
enforcement officers; and 5) asset management and recovery. By considering these things, it will produce ideal
regulations in the Indonesian legal system in accordance with the NCB Asset Forfeiture method. So that the
Asset Confiscation Legislation will have the aim of facilitating the state's efforts to save and restore losses
experienced by the state as a result of criminal acts, especially corruption crimes.

References

Adnan Topan Husodo. “Catatan Kritis Atas Usaha Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana

Korupsi Dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia,

, 584.

Herdiansyah Hamzah. Jejak Sejarah Korupsi Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta, 2008.

ttps://www.herdi.web.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Jejak-Sejarah-Korupsi-Di

Indonesia.pdf

Pohan Agustinus. Pengembalian Asset Kejahatan. Yogyakarta, 2008.

PPATK RI. “Buletin Statistik: Laporan Keuangan Transaksi Mencurigakan.” 2023.

Presiden Apresiasi Capaian Pemulihan Aset Dan Dorong Pembentukan UU Perampasan Aset

Tindak Pidana. Accessed June 1, 2024. https://www.presidenri.go.id/siaran

pers/presiden-apresiasi-capaian-pemulihan-aset-dan-dorong-pembentukan-uu

perampasan-aset-tindak-pidana/#:~:text=Terkait

pemulihan

aset%2C

Presiden

mendorong untuk segera ditetapkan,transparan%2C dan akuntabel%2C serta dapat

meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat.

Rofiq Hidayat. “Lima Urgensi Atas RUU Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana.” Accessed July

,

https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lima-urgensi-atas-ruu-perampasan

aset-tindak-pidana-lt61a73220c1b8f.

Saputra, Noverdi Puja. “Politik Hukum Dan Muatan Pengaturan Dalam Pembentukan

Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset.” Jurnal Info Singkat (Bidang Politik, Hukum, Dan

Keamanan: Kajian Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan Strategis) 15, no. 10 (2023): 3.

Yenti Garnasih. “Asset Recovery Act Sebagai Strategi Dalam Pengembalian Aset Hasil

Korupsi, Dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 7,

no. 4 (2010): 630.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Nur Aini, Ibnu Subarkah, & Zulkarnain. (2025). The Urgency Of Formulating A Law On Asset Forfeiture Using The Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Method As A Measure To Prevent Corruption Crimes . Widya Gama Law Review, 2(2), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.31328/wglr.v2i2.917

Most read articles by the same author(s)